Greek European Culture

Greek Language

All translations of Homer are erroneous

Who could have conjectured that even Pope would wander away so far from his matchless original? “Wretches!” cries Theoclymenus, the seer; and that becomes, “O race to death devote!” “Your heads are swathed in night,” turns into “With Stygian shade each destined peer” (peer is good!) “impending fates invade,” where Homer says nothing about Styx nor peers. The Latin Orcus takes the place of Erebus, and “the burning coasts” are derived from modern popular theology. The very grammar detains or defies the reader; is it the sun that does not give his golden orb to roll, or who, or what?


  1. rey

    I think you should try your hand at translating it anyway, because you’ll do a better job than all your predecessors.

  2. In Elpenor’s Lessons in Ancient Greek I translate only a few verses; even there one can affirm what A. Lang’s says, that Homer can not be translated.

    My translation can be called philosophical, caring mainly for the meaning in as deeper dimensions as I would be able to understand, and in the presentation of this meaning in a language that would keep something of the original’s service to the meaning. Even if we agree that those few verses found a translation adequate according to these criteria – still it is not Homer, it lacks the musical qualities of the original. It can be used by the student of Greek as a way of noticing crucial details, necessary to understand the original, helping him to enjoy better the original, but as a stand-alone translation I think that it could still be called erroneous. My advice to anyone who might wish to read Homer is A. Lang’s advice: Learn Greek!.