Ellopos Blog

Greek - European Culture

Metropolitan Kirill and the problem of the union of the churches

[ Pages: 1 2 3 ]

Kirill of Smolensk and Kaliningrad, referring to people’s reaction against Russia’s participation in WCC gatherings, remarked that if anybody says the Russian Church ‘should withdraw into isolation and stop bearing witness to its position in a loud voice before the whole world, then this man should prove clearly why we should do it’. (Moscow, November 9, Interfax) 

Fair demand, yet it’s not enough for a metropolitan to ask for the reasons; he needs also open ears and heart to feel perhaps unreasoned hopes and fears. If, as Kirill says, Russia is exceptionally hostile to the World Council of Churches, maybe this common feeling expresses a rejection of conditions and prospects undescribed by the official purpose of the participation to WCC, that is, maybe the faithful of Russia sense some real danger, and even if they can’t ‘prove it clearly’, their bishop should be able to understand or at least try to understand.  

Unless Kirill means that the faithful of Russia are demented, which I don’t believe he means, then why should they object to Russia ‘bearing witness to its position in a loud voice before the whole world’? Do they, perhaps, sense something else besides or beyond ‘bearing witness’? 

First of all, what does ‘bearing witness’ means in the WCC? For example, do Catholics of Protestants need these gatherings in order to know Orthodoxy? If they do, they won’t; if they were not able to know Orthodoxy after so many centuries, why will they know it now by some gatherings?  

The people of the Orthodox Churches perhaps fear that in these gatherings there is happening rather a sort of ‘negotiations’ than a witnessing to the truth. It is their task to understand and explain their reaction, as is the task of the shepherds to explain why these gatherings have indeed a real meaning. If this meaning is just ‘being in contact’, showing ‘good intentions’, etc., let them say so, let them assure the people of the Orthodox Churches that no doctrinal union is machinated or wanted, and then let them keep participating as much as they wish.  

Home of Ellopos Blog


Share your views

» Grab the Link:


Tags : Orthodox Christianity | Union of the Churches | Protestantism | world council of churches | Orthodoxy | Catholicism | News | russian church | Kirill of Smolensk and Kaliningrad | orthodox churches | Uniatism | Papacy | moscow | Europe - West | Unia

Related (automatic selection):

[ Pages: 1 2 3 ]

1 Comment

  1. They insult our culture and education.
     
    Here is what metropolitan Nicholas of Fthiotis in Greece says: “our age, with multiculturalism, communication and co-operation of peoples, brings the world very close geographically. We are not excused anymore to remain fanatics provincials, enclosed to the boundaries of the past and indifferent to the cosmogony of communication that is happening around us” (Encyclical of Christmas 2006).
     
    Nicholas says then, that the Orthodox Church was until now fanatic and provincial, and that this same church, despite her fanatical fathers and provincial tradition, will be transformed into an open and ecumenical organism, thanks to multiculturalism and global communication!
     
    They despise what they say they protect, all our tradition. They fail to interpret history, they fail to recognise the testimony of our fathers, they fail to understand the feelings of Orthodox peoples… God save us from such bishops!

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

*
Please answer this simple question .
Security Question

« Previous Post: The War to Iraq: Stop this crazy game  
  Next Post: Piet de Jong Exhibition in Athens »